In this page, we make available the description of the different methods used by the participants to produce the submitted solutions.
| Rank | Team Number | Team Name | method description |
| 1 | 19 | JPL | |
| 2 | 22 | ACT/ESA-ISAS | |
| 3 | 3 | Un. Texas | |
| 4 | 21 | CAS | |
| 5 | 4 | Tsinghua Un. | |
| 6 | 36 | RIAME-MAI | |
| 7 | 30 | Polimi-Soton-Dinamica | |
| 8 | 24 | Aerospace C. | |
| 9 | 29 | NASA Langley-An.Mech.Ass | |
| 10 | 6 | Colorado Un. | |
| 11 | 15 | Beihang Un. | |
| 12 | 10 | Xi’an SCC | |
| 13 | 8 | CASE-NUDT | |
| 14 | 13 | Odyssey S.R. | |
| 15 | 17 | Beijing ACC | |
| 16 | 11 | Nanjing Un. | |
| 17 | 28 | NASA Goddard-Un.Ill.-ai Sol. | |
| 18 | 23 | Math Opt. | |
| 19 | 9 | Un. Trento | |
| 20 | 5 | Michigan T. Un. | |
| 21 | 2 | DLR | |
| 22 | 7 | Beihang Un. | |
| 23 | 12 | Telespazio | |
| 24 | 14 | Un. Roma |